
Months following the rapid rebel offensive led by Islamists that toppled Bashar al-Assad’s regime, Syria continues to be a nation in crisis. The recently formed transitional administration, under the leadership of Ahmad al-Sharaa, is facing increasing security issues, with violent opposition from remaining Assad supporters. Although the breakdown of Assad’s repressive government was a significant milestone in Syria’s 13-year civil war, achieving lasting peace and stability is turning out to be extremely complex.
The interim government, primarily made up of individuals who gained influence from opposition areas such as Idlib in the northwest, has taken over a nation left divided and ravaged by prolonged conflict. The elimination of Assad-era institutions, including the military and the Baath Party, has led to the displacement of countless former regime members and supporters. A significant number of these individuals have declined to accept the new government’s authority, contributing to instability that jeopardizes the delicate administration.
The transitional government, composed largely of figures who rose to prominence from opposition strongholds like Idlib in the northwest, has inherited a fractured country devastated by years of conflict. The removal of Assad-era power structures, including the army and the Baath Party, has displaced hundreds of thousands of former regime officials and supporters. Many of these individuals have refused to reconcile with the new government, fueling unrest that threatens to destabilize the fragile administration.
In the periods following Assad’s exit, his supporters have become a major rebel force. These leftovers of the former regime, many deeply rooted in Syria’s military, intelligence, and political structures, have utilized their existing networks to coordinate armed opposition. This revolt has been especially active in the coastal regions of Latakia and Tartous, traditional strongholds of the Assad lineage and residence to a substantial portion of Syria’s Alawite minority.
In the months since Assad’s departure, his loyalists have emerged as a significant insurgent force. These remnants of the former regime, many of whom were deeply embedded in Syria’s military, intelligence, and political systems, have leveraged their pre-existing networks to organize armed resistance. This insurgency has been particularly active in the coastal provinces of Latakia and Tartous, long-standing strongholds of the Assad family and home to much of Syria’s Alawite minority.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights recently reported a deadly ambush in Latakia province, where gunmen targeted government forces attempting to apprehend a former Assad official. The attack left at least 13 security personnel dead and set off a wave of violence across the region. By the following day, clashes had escalated, resulting in over 120 deaths—a stark reminder of the challenges facing the interim government.
The Institute for the Study of War, a research organization, has warned that Assad loyalists are likely to form some of the most effective insurgent cells in Syria. Their familiarity with military tactics and their ability to utilize established networks give them a strategic advantage in coordinating attacks against the new government. For interim President Sharaa, this growing insurgency represents the most significant obstacle to consolidating authority and ensuring national security.
The rebel activities in Latakia and Tartous have intensified the friction between Syria’s Sunni-led interim government and the Alawite minority, a Shia sect that was the core of Assad’s administration. The Alawites, who held influence and advantages during Assad’s rule, have suffered considerable setbacks following its downfall. Despite Sharaa’s promises to honor Syria’s varied religious groups, many now feel excluded and under threat.
The insurgent activity in Latakia and Tartous has further strained relations between Syria’s Sunni-led transitional government and the Alawite minority, a Shia offshoot that formed the backbone of Assad’s regime. The Alawites, who enjoyed privileges and power under the Assad government, have faced significant losses in the aftermath of its collapse. Many now feel marginalized and targeted, despite Sharaa’s assurances that his administration will respect Syria’s diverse religious communities.
The scenario in Syria’s southern areas also remains unstable. Although an agreement with Druze forces was secured earlier this week to reduce hostilities, the government still encounters resistance from multiple factions nationwide. With distinct regions overseen by rival groups supported by external powers, the interim administration’s control is both constrained and divided.
The situation in Syria’s south also remains precarious. While a deal was reached with Druze forces earlier this week to ease tensions, the government continues to face resistance from various factions across the country. With different regions controlled by competing groups backed by foreign powers, the interim administration’s authority is limited and fragmented.
The economic and diplomatic challenges ahead
Beyond the immediate security threats, Syria’s transitional government is contending with a dire economic situation. Years of war have left nine out of ten Syrians living in poverty, and the country remains under crippling international sanctions imposed during Assad’s rule. Sharaa’s administration has made lifting these sanctions a priority, viewing it as essential to rebuilding the economy and gaining legitimacy on the global stage.
A Nation Fragmented
Even after Assad’s downfall, Syria continues to be a mosaic of rival factions and external forces. The interim government’s authority is anything but complete, as diverse groups dominate different regions of the nation. These factions, frequently supported by foreign entities with conflicting agendas, further complicate Syria’s delicate political scenario.
For Sharaa, the challenge of bringing the nation together involves winning the people’s trust as much as it does defeating the insurgent menace. His administration has urged ex-members of Assad’s security apparatus to lay down their arms and embrace reconciliation, yet advancement has been gradual. “We are monitoring everyone, but we aim to avoid giving the impression of a witch hunt,” stated a senior official in the interim government. This careful strategy illustrates the fragile equilibrium the new leadership must maintain as it seeks to re-establish order without isolating important parts of the populace.
The Path Forward
The road ahead
The fall of Bashar al-Assad marked a significant turning point in Syria’s history, but the country’s transition to peace and stability remains fraught with challenges. From the insurgent threat posed by Assad loyalists to the deep divisions among Syria’s religious and ethnic communities, the road ahead is uncertain. The interim government must navigate these obstacles while addressing the pressing needs of a population devastated by more than a decade of war.
At the same time, Syria’s leaders face mounting international scrutiny as they seek to lift sanctions and secure the support needed to rebuild the country. For the transitional government, success will depend on its ability to address the root causes of unrest, foster inclusivity, and demonstrate a genuine commitment to breaking from the authoritarian practices of the past.
As clashes continue and tensions rise, Syria’s future hangs in the balance. The coming months will be critical for Sharaa’s government as it works to consolidate power, restore security, and lay the foundation for a more stable and prosperous nation.